An examination of the demise of the Mubarak regime
through the eyes of Egyptians, whose lives were, until now and, ironically,
still in many ways, defined by it, is a helpful tool to understand the current
situation of people revolting in the name of “bread, freedom and social
justice.”
When the youth protesters first took to Cairo’s Tahrir
Square on January 25 2011, they chanted their desire, among other things, for a
state that promised social justice, unity, and equal rights for all. Even
though they committed violent acts at times, most of these youngsters were
longing for a new and democratic Egypt it seemed. They strongly believed that
what was experienced in Tahrir at the outset of the Revolution would
materialize in real social and political life.
Recently
however, the opposition group the National Salvation Front (NSF) called for a
protest against the Islamist government to “continue the Revolution” and reiterate
"demands" for the dismissal of the current government, the amendment
of the recently-approved constitution and the appointment of a new
prosecutor-general.
The carnival
of rage, misery and comic defiance
After
two years of non-stop uprising, Egyptians do not “do'' curfews, they go out in
the street to watch what a curfew looks like and soon join in! There was a
joke that came out as a headline in one of Cairo’s newspaper today saying that
one of the biggest problems with the curfew is that there were so many people
in the streets! A few days later, Morsi was forced to reconsider the state
of emergency he imposed in the Canal Zone cities. He reconsidered after he
realized that no one would ever respect him or his government, or any tyranny
for that matter.
In
Ismailia, residents organized football games in front of the governorate
headquarters in a show of defiance. Some of the audiences were soldiers from
the Third Army, deployed in the city. The media reported on the curfew football
tournament in Ismailia, in which a team named "Revolution" beat a
team called “Shater” (named after the most powerful man within the Muslim
Brothers) five to zero!
A mixture of rage and comedic defiance has been the
hallmark of the Arab Spring, particularly in the Egyptian scene. Protest and
revolution shake the Arab world’s peoples in this painful transitional process.
However, when looking at these macro-processes, it is inevitable to take into
account the strategic reserve of soft power and the vast reservoir of tradition
making sense of life under harsh conditions of political tyranny, religious
extremism and social conservatism. Mixing misery with humorous acts has always
been a means of survival in the history of Egyptians. Even when they are not
revolting, Egyptian humor has been their defense against apathy and
atomization.
This mix of rage, misery and comic defiance makes
political activism in the street seem like a spectacle and carnival; from afar,
it might seem insane. In his idea of the carnival, the great Russian
literary critic and semiotician, Mikhail Bhaktin, emphasized that the act of
carnival liberates, transgresses and subverts. If the carnival is locked into
the dictates of the ruling clique (whether political or religious tyrannies),
perhaps then it becomes merely a contained performance of freedom, as opposed
to genuine freedom. However, the defiance of curfew through the organization of
a traditional music festival in Port Said and football games in Ismailia with
winners and losers representing political forces, is an act of intended
subversion and, definitely of liberation.
I am not exaggerating if I say that the brave youth of
Egypt are fighting the battle of freedom for the good of the entire region. If
it goes bad here, it will go worse everywhere else. There is a shared destiny.
Youngsters in Tunisia, Libya, Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq and the Gulf are
very likely to be looking at Egypt with great anxiety.
The
nation-wide demonstrations that took place over the last few days were to show
solidarity with Port Said, Suez, and Ismailia. In addition to a march on
Wednesday, the Opposition, the National Salvation Front (NSF) announced that
there would be a large rally on Friday in Tahrir Square and all other main
squares across Egypt (mainly the cities north of Cairo in and around the Nile
Delta). The cities, south of Cairo in Upper Egypt are often not part of the
uprising, reportedly due to the strong presence of Islamists and/or the high
level of illiteracy and poverty.
New
types of protesters are joining in!
I have
attended demonstrations, watching Egyptian protesters since the summer of 2011.
Last week, attendees of the demonstrations were a new mélange of people. They
were not simply overwhelmingly youth, bearded Islamist men or middle class
persons. There were many “ordinary” Egyptians, and the diversity that that
represents, who were fiercely fighting the police and burning buildings. Many of these “ordinary” Egyptians were not
affiliated with any political group or religious organization.
It is
quite possible that many of these people have never cared to vote. However,
this illuminates the depth of the political impasse in this country and, by the
same token, it shows how it is important to deal seriously with the
socioeconomic injustices that Egypt has been suffering over the last few
decades.
Poor
education, unemployment, poverty and disenfranchisement created a reservoir of
resentment against Mubarak’s regime and now against the Muslim Brotherhood (MB)
government. This rage is simmering not only among the youth who revolted
against Mubarak and now the MB, but also among the many newcomers to the world
of Egyptian protests.
There
are reasons to believe that these protests will only escalate, due to the
stagnant political reform process, lack of confidence in basic government
services, and social justice gap. Protesters perceive the MB government as one
that is working to maintain the status quo, which has triggered something akin
to a Muslim Brother-phobia among many Egyptians.
As a
result, every few weeks there is an explosion of violence. Notably however,
what happened in the Suez Canal Zone cities has nothing to do with the
political games between the Islamists and their opponents in Cairo. Rather,
they were provoked to protest for reasons that are intimate to their day-to-day
life. This is an example of “ordinary” Egyptians joining the protests. Egyptians have time and again tried the
ballot box; they have been through six elections in two years, with no avail.
They see no progress. Frustration is widespread. There is a feeling on the
ground that two years have been wasted in this painful transitional period,
first under the rule of the military, and now under the Islamists.
Until
there are responsive politicians and a capable government, able to deal
seriously with the problems of economy, security and political reform, unrest
will continue, putting yet more strain on this fragile society and economy. It
seems as if political forces in Egypt lack the ability to find ways to deal
with the age-old political authoritarianism and socioeconomic injustice. Many
citizens in the Middle East, not only in Egypt, feel that the wave of uprisings
has produced many politicians whose ambition far exceeds their capacity and
personal quality. Fortunately or unfortunately, transition periods are
learning processes that the region has to live through.
Ismailia and Port Said have witnessed mass
demonstrations in defiance of President Morsi’s decision. Soldiers from the
Second Army, deployed in Port Said, allowed a 2000-strong protest to pass
through checkpoint, breaking the curfew. After midnight, the shops and street
cafes of Suez were still open. The army, for its part, has not been interfering
or trying to impose the curfew.
Setting aside any positive elements of
what might be happening in the Egyptian scene (such as more people feeling
emboldened), it is clear that the country cannot sustain its current course.
Radical moves and political courage need to manifest.
No comments:
Post a Comment